Current:Home > StocksWhat income do you need to be in the top 50% of Americans? Here's the magic number -Capitatum
What income do you need to be in the top 50% of Americans? Here's the magic number
View
Date:2025-04-16 13:22:22
The Census Bureau's Current Population Survey (CPS) collects data from roughly 60,000 U.S. households each month, representing about 110,000 individuals aged 15 and older. The surveys are administered monthly to provide continuity, but the results are published annually.
In 2023, those U.S. households reported a median income of $80,610, up 4% from $77,540 in 2022. That means half of households reported less income, and half reported more. In other words, any household that made more than $80,610 ranks among the top 50% nationally.
However, age is an important variable where income is concerned, simply because older people have had more time to accumulate assets and advance in their careers. For that reason, anyone interested in benchmarking their financial status should use age-based data so that they are comparing themselves to their peers.
The median income across U.S. households by age
The Census Bureau defines income as including wages from employment, Social Security benefits, welfare payments, interest on savings or bonds, dividends, unemployment and workmen's compensation and private and government pensions.
The chart below shows median before-tax incomes by age demographics among the respondents to the Current Population Survey.
As shown, the median income across all households was $80,610 in 2023. Households represented by people aged 45 to 54 had the highest median income at $110,700, while those aged 65 and older had the lowest median income at $54,710.
The 2023 Current Population Survey also provides information on income distribution. The chart below shows household income at selected percentiles.
The percentile distribution above details what shares of the population had income above and below specific thresholds. For instance, income at the 10th percentile was $18,980 in 2023. That means 10% of American households reported less income last year, and 90% of American households reported more.
Similarly, income at the 70th percentile was $127,300 in 2023. That means 70% of American households had less income last year, while 30% of American households had more.
How workers with median incomes can build $1 million portfolios
Many financial advisors recommend the 50-30-20 budgeting framework, which divides after-tax income into three spending categories:
- Needs: 50% of a household\'s after-tax income should be dedicated to non-discretionary expenses like groceries, rent or mortgage and utilities. Minimum interest payments are also grouped into this category.
- Wants: 30% of after-tax income should be dedicated to discretionary expenses like dining out, hobbies, luxury items and travel.
- Savings: 20% of after-tax income should dedicated to retirement savings. Interest payments above the minimum are also grouped into this category.
The 2023 Current Population Survey reported a median after-tax income of $77,790 for households represented by those 64 and younger. I selected that age group because many people have stopped saving for retirement once they reach 65, and are instead drawing down on their retirement account balances.
With that in mind, the 50-30-20 framework stipulates the median worker under 65 should save about $15,550 per year, which is about $1,295 per month. One smart place to invest that money would be an index fund that tracks the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) like the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO).
The S&P 500 is widely regarded as the best barometer for the U.S. stock market. It outperformed almost every other asset class over the last two decades, and it has never produced a negative return over any 20-year period in history. That means investors are essentially guaranteed to profit if they put money into an S&P 500 index fund and leave it there for at least two decades.
Moreover, the S&P 500 has typically produced robust returns. The index's total return level (with dividends reinvested) has been about 2,000% over the last 30 years, which equates to 10.6% annually. At that rate of return, if a person invested $650 monthly in an S&P 500 index fund -- that is, about half the amount the median household should save each month under the 50-30-20 framework -- their portfolio would be worth $127,900 after one decade, $478,300 after two decades and $1.4 million after three decades.
In short, the median U.S. household income is more than sufficient for an investor to build a $1 million portfolio, provided they invest consistently over the long haul.
Trevor Jennewine has positions in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
Should you invest $1,000 in S&P 500 Index right now?
Offer from the Motley Fool: Before you buy stock in S&P 500 Index, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and S&P 500 Index wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $722,320!*
Stock Advisor provides investors with an easy-to-follow blueprint for success, including guidance on building a portfolio, regular updates from analysts and two new stock picks each month. TheStock Advisorservice has more than quadrupled the return of S&P 500 since 2002*.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of September 16, 2024
veryGood! (544)
Related
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- Judge weighs whether to block removal of Confederate memorial at Arlington Cemetery
- Takeaways from lawsuits accusing meat giant JBS, others of contributing to Amazon deforestation
- North Carolina’s 2024 election maps are racially biased, advocates say in lawsuit
- $1 Frostys: Wendy's celebrates end of summer with sweet deal
- Reproductive rights group urges Ohio prosecutor to drop criminal charge against woman who miscarried
- Why Kelly Osbourne Says She Wants Plastic Surgery for Christmas
- Detroit officer accused of punching 71-year-old man is charged with manslaughter following his death
- 2024 Olympics: Gymnast Ana Barbosu Taking Social Media Break After Scoring Controversy
- Jennifer Love Hewitt Slams Sexualization of Her Younger Self
Ranking
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- Florida house explosion injures 4 and investigators are eyeing gas as the cause, sheriff says
- Flooding continues across Northeast; thousands still without power: Live updates
- Climate talks call for a transition away from fossil fuels. Is that enough?
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Want to buy an EV? Now is a good time. You can still get the full tax credit and selection
- McDonald's CosMc's, Starbucks and Dunkin': How do their drinks compare in calories and sugar?
- 20-year-old wins Miss France beauty pageant with short hair: Why her win sparked debate
Recommendation
USA women's basketball live updates at Olympics: Start time vs Nigeria, how to watch
North Korea and Russia clash with US, South Korea and allies over Pyongyang’s latest missile launch
Chelsea and Fulham win penalty shootouts to reach English League Cup semifinals
Wisconsin Assembly’s top Republican wants to review diversity positions across state agencies
USA women's basketball live updates at Olympics: Start time vs Nigeria, how to watch
Wisconsin man faces homicide charges after alleged drunken driving crash kills four siblings
Zelenskyy says he is weighing Ukrainian military’s request for mobilization of up to 500,000 troops
Study: Abortions on TV remain unrealistic — but 'Morning Show' treatment was nuanced